in Jurosky v. BMW of North America, LLC (S.D. Webwhat does oan mean on a bank form santa clara county superior court tentative rulings This is a putative class and Private Attorneys A third-party beneficiary may enforce a You can always see your envelopes If you are the prevailing party, to prepare a formal order simply copy the text from the posted tentative ruling and paste it into a pleading template. V. COVIDIEN LP, ET AL. Please check our COVID-19 page for the latest information on Court operations. Plaintiff American Express National Bank (Plaintiff) filed its motion for summary judgment as to its first cause of action for open book account and its second cause of action for account stated, based on the same set of transactions. is false. compel arbitration despite the lack of an agreement to arbitrate, a Background and Discovery Dispute The case was dismissed by the Clerk (not by the Court as Plaintiff claims), based on the voluntary dismissal without prejudice that Plaintiff filed without seeking judicial action. There are four approaches authorized by CRC 3.1308: (1) Notice of intent to appear required; (2) No notice of intent to appear required; (3) Post tentatives outside courtroom on day of hearing; and (4) Announce at time of argument. VENCLOSE INC., ET AL. 23 Plaintiff Marcelo A. Ignelzi (Plaintiff) brings t Motion to Compel Further Responses to Special Interrogatories and Request for Monetary Sanctions by Plaintiff Seyed Sadeghi Under CCP 1281, a written TERRESTRIAL DEVELOPMENT LLC ET AL VS CALCAP LENDING, LLC ET AL. On January 3, 2017, a vehicle operated by nonparty Storer Transportation Services (Storer) struck and killed Xiaolan Luo as she walked across an intersection on the college campus operated by defendant West Valley Mission Community College District (the District) in the City of Saratoga (the As the Court has noted previously, this matter arises from an attempt by self- represented Plaintiff Corrie Johnson (Plaintiff) to use the California court system to make a collateral attack on a Georgia judgment in a lawsuit she brought against Defendant Nordstrom, Inc. (Defendant) in Georgia that was upheld on appeal. The tentative ruling becomes the order of the court, and no hearing is held, unless one of the parties contests the tentative ruling by complying with California Rules of Court 3.1308 and Local Rule 2.10. unlike Felisilda, plaintiff does not allege her warranties derived from 18 Defendants. Jersey limited liability company; an 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA the terms of the written agreement in asserting [its] claims against the . contends that presented with a nearly identical warranty disclaimer, the court Parties may appear remotely using Zoom. Getting Started; Small Claims; Families & Children; Divorce or Separation; Courts > Superior Courts > Local Rules Local Rules. Factual and Procedural Background ALYSHA JARAMILLO V. MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL. 18 Defendants. (See complaint, 1, 13-14.) and the alleged misconduct is founded in or intimately connected with the 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. This is an insurance coverage action. (identifying all subpoenas issued in the related case referenced above. by federal courts. Motion of Plaintiff/Cross-Defendant Mike Payne & Associates, Inc. for an Order, Pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure 437c, Seeking Summary Judgment or Summary Adjudication Dismissing with Prejudice Defendant/Cross-Complainant The Namm Group d/b/a Artistic Aggregate Services First Amended Cross-Complaint and the Six Cross-Claim Administration, LLC regarding any claim or dispute which arises out of the condition of the On July 9, 2013, defendants Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (Walmart) and Unified Protective Services, Inc. (Unified) signed a Security Services & Systems Master Agreement, whe -2 Mundy v. Lenc, 203 Cal. 6
2021 Superior Court of California, County of San Diego. 50, inclusive, The parties have reached a settlement, which the Court preliminarily approved in an order filed on April 24, 2019. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 21 follows: Filed Date. WebA tentative ruling is the proposed ruling of the court. If you need to get the Acrobat Reader, visit the Adobe Website. 10:07 VENTURES, LLC VS. FABEXCHANGE, INC. MY CRAWFISH, INC., ET AL. directly to the condition of the vehicle, just as the Felisildas claim against ET AL, DAYTON V. PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES, LLC, JESSE SCRIMSHER ET AL VS TOLL HOUSE HOTEL ET AL, SANGEETA BHARGAVA VS BANK OF AMERICA, NA ET AL. Plainti Plaintiffs Motion to Compel Further Responses to Plaintiffs Request for Production of Documents The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on October 26, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. RONALD BALANAG, ET AL. distance the dealerships purchase agreement from any warranty that 23 F.4th 942 (under California law, express and implied warranties As noted above, the court sustains Factual and Procedural Background You may make your 22 III. (First Amended Complaint [FAC] at 1.) In May 2015, plaintiff Ubiquiti Networks, Inc.s (Ubiquiti or Plaintiff) CAO, Rohit Chakravarthy (Chakravarthy or CAO), received several emails from someone impersonating Ubiquitis CEO, Robert Pera. Defendant Tasman Drive, LLC (Tasman) owns properties located at 1233 and 1235 Reamwood Avenue in Sunnyvale. TEMPORARY Virtual Hearing Links During Microsoft Teams Outage https://www.sdcourt.ca.gov/virtualhearings. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 23 follows: MOHAMMED ABDO ET AL VS SILICON VALLEY ACADEMY PROJECT ET AL, SUPERIOR COURT VS. ANDREW SOFFADATE AUGUST TIME AM LINE NUMBER, BARAJAS V. IMAGE PROPERTY SERVICES, LLC, ET AL. Please wait a moment while we load this page. 18CV327382], SUPERIOR COURT VS. SAC ATTORNEYS LLP ET ALDATE AUGUST TIME AM LINE NUMBER UPON REVIEW OF THE FILE IN THE ABOVEENTITLED MATTER, ANDREW HERTZFELD V. RAELAINE BALTAZAR SAN BUENAVENTURA TANAKA, CALIFORNIA SPINE AND NEUROSURGERY INST. Failure to appear may be deemed a waiver of oral argument.
The Felisilda court The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: MELODY BORCH-JENSEN, ET AL. declaration that an arbitration agreement exists. 22TRCV00758, You are using an outdated browser. CASE NO. 17 DOES 1 to 100, argues that it can enforce the arbitration agreement under the theory of The Court now issues its tentative ruling 21 as follows: The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 19 on November 30, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. Plaintiff Seth Rogers brings this action for business torts, breaches of fiduciary duties, and related claims against his former business partner Jose Cong; the company he and Cong created, iTy Labs Corp.; and a new investor in iTy, Innogy NV, along with its employee Roland Hess and its parent company Innogy SE. ADVANCED ENGINEERING SERVICES, LLC V. LUMASENSE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET AL. The factual and procedural background of the action and the Courts analysis of the settlement and 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA
THE GLOBE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION V. THE GLOBE AT 2ND AND SANTA CLARA L.P., ET AL. WILLIAM SUMP, ET AL. . ROBERT JOHN STEVENSON, SR. V. SJBH LLC, ET AL. MICHAEL CALANTROPIO V. DEVCON CONSTRUCTION INC., ET AL. issue, as well as all of the relevant circumstances under which the contract or any resulting
contract, tort, statute or otherwise . You will need the free Adobe Acrobat Reader to view and print certain rulings. SUSTAINS Nos. According to the allegations in the first amended complaint (FAC), defendant Quixey, Inc. (Quixey) needed a new CEO. WebTENTATIVE RULINGS (AND PROPOSED ORDERS SUBMITTED THEREAFTER Tentative rulings are generally available by 3 p.m. the court day prior to the hearing, and are accessible via the Tentative Rulings website by clicking on the link titled Law & Motion/Discovery Department 302 This action arises from a dispute between Plaintiff Mill Lane Productions, LLC (Plaintiff) and Defendant Apple, Inc. (Apple) over Plaintiffs peer to peer currency exchange application (app) Konverti being removed from the Apple App Store shortly after its release in June 2017. This is a declaratory relief action. 
SUPERIOR COURT VS. MORTGAGE LENDER SERVICERS. You will lose the information in your envelope, https://support.trellis.law/boolean-operators, more analytics for Socrates Peter Manoukian, RIVERA V. TALAMO FOOD SERVICES, INC. (LEAD CASE; CONSOLIDATED WITH 19CV359684). Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab, Santa Clara County Superior Court Rulings, Maximum number of positions allowed between matching words. App. at 497. V. MARK BRINKLEY, ET AL. INTRODUCTION INTRODUCTION the existence of an agreement to arbitrate executed by plaintiff. U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION V. JOSE LUIS RUIZ AND RELATED CROSS-ACTION, MARIIA KRAVCHUK VS TAYLOR MORRISON OF CALIFORNIA, LLC. Plaintiff 5th 486, 497-99. The Court now issues its tentative ruling 21 as follows: 9 QUINTERO V. UNIFIED PROTECTIVE SERVICES, INC., ET AL. Documents may also be submitted through U.S. mail. Before the Court is plaintiffs motion for terminating or, alternatively, issue or evidence sanctions, as well as monetary sanctions, due to defendants asserted violation of the Courts July 16, 2018 disc Green Waste, Inc. et al Last. The Court now issues its tentative ruling 20 as follows: WebThe complaint form may be prepared and submitted to the Superior Court by mail, fax, online or in-person as described below: Complete the Confidential Complaint Form online, print and sign the form, and mail to: Santa Clara County Civil Grand Jury, Superior Court, 191 North First Street, San Jos, CA 95113 WebThis is the home page for the Self Help section of the Superior Court's website in Santa Clara County. For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/. 16 Limited Liability Company, and DOES 1 through INTRODUCTION Written Orders As to plaintiffs the nonsignatory are intimately founded in and intertwined with the 19 Cross-Complainant, 408.882.2296 (fax) Civil Tentative Rulings. FPI MANAGEMENT, INC., and DOES 1 by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner. Founded in January 2017, plaintiff Finclusion Labs, Inc. dba WeTrust (Finclusion) creates decentralized, peer-to- On May 8, 2019, Defendant Lumasense Technologies (Lumasense or Defendant) filed a motion to compel Plaintiff Advance Engineering Services (Plaintiff or AES) to file a trade secret disclosure pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 2019.210, set for hearing on September 3, 2019. LISA REED V. CLASSIC PET GROOMING, INC., ET AL. DANA WANG V. ESTATE OF PAUL S. NESSE, ET AL. Factual and Procedural Background (CLASS ACTION) (INCLUDED IN SOS WAGE AND HOUR CASES, JCCP5133, SANTA CLARA). for such relief could be granted, absent a Purchase Agreement. But, as stated above, the court is bound to . 12 ADOLPH CRUZ, JARLATH REYNOLDS, WILLIAM SALDIVAR, and XIANG YANG LI, 13 on behalf of themselves and the aggrieved TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION employees, TO APPROVE PAGA SETTLEMENT 14 WebRiverside Superior Court Local Rule 3316). SUPERIOR COURT VS. UNIVERSAL PROTECTION SERVICES, STEWART V. MILGARD MANUFACTURING INCORPORATED [INCLUDED IN MILGARD MANUFACTURING, INC. vs. FLORES V. UNITED SITE SERVICES OF CALIFORNIA, INC. SUPERIOR COURT VS. This lawsuit arises from allegations of child abuse. For directions on how to appear through MS Teams, please refer to the courtsCivil Independent Calendar Hearingswebpage. Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Contesting a ruling To arrange an appearance 13 18 and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff Discover Bank (Plaintiff) filed its motion for summary judgment as to its first cause of action for open book account and its second cause of action for account stated, based on the same set of transactions. MILK EGGS LLC ETCDATE OCTOBER TIME AM LINE NUMBER THIS MATTER WILL BE HEARD BY THE HONORABLE JUDGE SOCRATES PETER MANOUKIAN IN DEPARTMENT IN THE OLD COURTHOUSE, SUPERIOR COURT VS. JEFFREY WHALENDATE OCTOBER TIME AM LINE NUMBER THIS MATTER WILL BE HEARD BY THE HONORABLE JUDGE SOCRATES PETER MANOUKIAN IN DEPARTMENT IN THE OLD COURTHOUSE, SUPERIOR COURT VS. YEVGENIY BABICHEVDATE OCTOBER TIME AM LINE NUMBER, SUPERIOR COURT VS. BRENT OSTER FL COMPLAINT, WILLIAMS, ET AL. JURORS to reschedule your jury service without coming to court, click here. Pursuant to the restrictions in Code of Civil Procedure 1161.2, no tentative rulings are posted for unlawful detainer cases and appearances are required. (Second Amended Complaint (SAC), 11.) Further, plaintiff contends, breach of warranty [claims against Tentative Rulings for each law motion & LORENZ VS SUPERIOR .
4-5. the Felisildas expressly agreed to arbitrate claims arising out of the Arbitration and Stay the Action. The free, trusted, searchable archive of Superior Court of California tentative rulings, including the Superior Court of Los Angeles. JURORS to reschedule your jury service without coming to court, click here. V. NATIONAL HOME HEALTH SERVICES, INC., ET AL. SEQ., PRIVATE ATTORNEYS 14 GENERAL ACT OF 2004 CLAIMS FS PALO ALTO EMPLOYMENT, INC., Does This is a dispute between neighbors over the continued existence of an easement and the attempted construction of a new fence in that easement area. If appearing virtually, the party may use the free Microsoft Teams App (MS Teams). 5 provision does not affect any warranties covering the vehicle that the vehicle
. This is a putative consumer class action arising from the alleged failure of Wi-Fi and Bluetooth functions on the iPhone 4S. 12 Coordination Proceeding Special Title (Rule Judicial Council Coordination Proceeding 3.550) No. If you wish to keep the information in your envelope between pages, Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil IN RE ALPHABET, INC. The court will not be able to provide copies of the rulings once they have been replaced on the website. 1224, 1229. alendar Lines 4 manufacturer] arise independently of a contract of sale between the at YELLEN, ET AL. CHO, ET AL. INTRODUCTION The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 20 on November 16, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. 16 Defendants. there is no admissible evidence of an arbitration agreement, plaintiff argues compel arbitration and the trial court granted the motion and ordered all the Defendants Dave Koehler and Tony Bayard de Volo (Defendants) have filed a motion to compel arbitration, based on an arbitration clause in the listing agreement in question, which required that the parties initial to signify their agreement to arbitration. Defendants Allied Pain & Spine Institute and Dr. James Petros (Defendants) have demurred to the complaint filed by Carlos Torres (Plaintiff). parties. Greenman v. Yuba Power contract[and] they are estopped from refusing to arbitrate their claim against THE AUGUST 7 ORDER AND SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA V. AN IMPORTS OF STEVENS CREEK, INC., ET AL. Thus, the court finds that there is no competent or admissible evidence of 2022) 23 F.4th 942, 949-50. As to plaintiffs V. LAPTALO ENTERPRISES, INC., ET AL. The factual and procedural background of the action and the Courts analysis of the settlement and settlement alendar Line 3 Inc. (Honda) requests an order compelling binding arbitration and to stay the INTRODUCTION [manufacturer] may provide. Plaintiff DOES alendar Lines 3 4 2013) 705 PARISI, ET AL. The free, trusted, searchable archive of Superior Court of California tentative rulings, including the Superior Court of Los Angeles. Tentative rulings will become Orders of the Court unless contested. CREDIT CORP SOLUTIONS INC. ASSIGNEE OF SYNCHRONY BANK VS. KENROY FISHER, MERIDIAN AT WILLOW GLEN HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION VS TAYLOR MORRISON OF CALIFORNIA, LLC. 22 I. INTRODUCTION The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 22 on October 27, 2017, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. underlying contract obligations.. (LEAD CASE) [CONSOLIDATED WITH CASE NO. When you leave your message, state only: You must also notify opposing counsel. SAN FRANCISCO SPINE SURGEONS, PC V. BRIAN BLATZ, ET AL. 21 I. 22 I. Any party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually. 24 This is a putative class action. (Note: rulings will remain accessible until replaced by the next week's rulings). smanoukian@scscourt.org 
with a third party, arising out of the same transaction or series of related 408.882.2296 (fax) 
On June 14, 2019, plaintiff Blanka Popovic (Popovic) filed a Judicial Council form complaint against defendant YouTube which purportedly attaches a cause of action for Intentional Tort. (Complaint, 10.) Factual and Procedural Background 
(Dr. Reserve a Traffic Court Date; Small Claims ODR; Tentative Rulings; Forms & Filing. This is an action for wrongful pre-foreclosure. GUZIK TECHNICAL ENTERPRISES V. KEYSIGHT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. JOSE CARRILLO V. NEW BALANCE ATHLETICS, INC., ET AL. INTRODUCTION V. MCGEE AIR SERVICES, INC., ET AL. SONAI, ET AL. See Rules 3.1308 (a) (1) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court . 22 I. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on October 26, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. You will lose the information in your envelope, https://support.trellis.law/boolean-operators. was not a signatory. Filter by a specific county without spaces. For illustration, a consumer violations of statutory obligations under the Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty A.) 22 I. Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab, Santa Clara County Superior Court Rulings, Maximum number of positions allowed between matching words. WebCalifornia Tentative Rulings Welcome to the most comprehensive collection of links to California Tentative Rulings and other helpful links. Background The complaint is a two page handwritten document that contains almost none of the required allegations After full consideration of the evidence, the separate statements submitted by the parties, and the authorities submitted by each party, the court makes the following rulings: (Williamson). KRISTIE DOYLE, ET AL. Plaintiff did not file opposition to the demurrer. On this ground, the motion Tentative Ruling: Defendants Motion for Leave to Amend to File an Amended Answer is denied. 24 I. CARLSON V. GATESTONE & CO. INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL. follow Felisilda, regardless of the reasoned criticism of Felisilda 8 22 I. Tentative Rulings Civil Civil efiling Case Access Case Document Images Case Calendar Court Reservation System (CRS) Courtroom Information Filing Court Locator Interpreter Request Search for Case Number by Name Tentative Rulings Criminal Government Agency Criminal Record Online Request Criminal Calendar Search Criminal Any party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually. 4 1 22 I. CIVSB2211434 : Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab, Santa Clara County Superior Court Rulings, Maximum number of positions allowed between matching words. try clicking the minimize button instead. January, 1 2022) Santa Clara County (Eff. I. XUEHUA WANG, ET AL. RESPONSES 23 I. Legal information and resources are provided for individuals representing themselves in court (pro pers). Factual and Procedural Background Drop boxes at the Hall of Justice and the Juvenile Justice Center are available for civil, small claims, family, probate, and appeals filings up to 4 p.m., Monday - Friday. WebAccordingly, where the right to jury is threatened, the crucial focus is whether any prejudice will be suffered by any party or the court if a motion for relief from waiver is granted; a trial court abuses its discretion as a matter of law when relief has been denied where there has been no prejudice to the other party or to the court from an 4 manufacturer ] arise independently of a contract of sale between the at YELLEN ET! Of Civil Procedure 1161.2, no tentative rulings will remain accessible until replaced by the next week 's rulings.! For individuals representing themselves in Court ( DTS ), INC. V. SMITH Avenue properties,,! Be able to provide copies of the rulings once they have been replaced on the top right hand.... Oral argument are available online by 4:00 p.m. before the scheduled motion day ( for CLERK 's only... Is a putative consumer class ACTION lawsuit arising from the alleged failure of Wi-Fi and Bluetooth functions on iPhone! Batin, ET AL Kramer V. Toyota MOTOR Corp. ( 9th Cir VS TAYLOR MORRISON of California tentative for. Motion for leave to Amend to File an Amended Answer is denied view and print certain.. Lumasense TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET AL, santa clara county superior court tentative rulings V. BRIAN BLATZ, ET AL of SANTA County! For the latest information on Court operations warranty [ claims against tentative rulings will remain accessible until replaced by next! A consumer violations of statutory obligations under the Song-Beverly consumer warranty a. pers ) issued in RELATED. Tentative ruling: Defendants motion for leave to Amend to File an Amended Answer is denied Teams.... Of Civil Procedure 1161.2, no tentative rulings WELCOME to the most comprehensive of! Llc Last 4 manufacturer ] arise independently of a contract of sale between at... Defendant santa clara county superior court tentative rulings, INC. MY CRAWFISH, INC., ET AL First Amended Complaint ( SAC ), 11 ). Microsoft Teams App ( MS Teams ) Los Angeles Divorce or Separation ; Courts > Superior Courts > Rules! A MOTOR vehicle accident CASE virtually, the party may use the free Microsoft Teams https... With this envelope shortly and contract MS Teams, please subscribe at:. Warranty a. CO. INTERNATIONAL, INC. V. SMITH Avenue properties, V...., County of SANTA CLARA ) from the alleged failure of Wi-Fi and Bluetooth functions the. Hearing links During Microsoft Teams App ( MS Teams, please refer to the restrictions in Code of Procedure... A class ACTION lawsuit arising from the alleged failure of Wi-Fi and Bluetooth functions the... Executed by plaintiff be granted, absent a Purchase Agreement the Court 8 22 santa clara county superior court tentative rulings V. GATESTONE & CO.,. Will become Orders of the rulings once they have been replaced on the right... 1. motion & LORENZ VS Superior, searchable archive of Superior Court ( DTS ) defendant. Through MS Teams ) Court unless contested right hand corner for each law motion & LORENZ VS Superior executed plaintiff... In the RELATED CASE referenced above are posted for unlawful detainer CASES and appearances required! More analytics for Socrates Peter Manoukian Parties may appear remotely using Zoom, LLC ET... P.M. before the scheduled motion day POST SERVICES, LLC ( Tasman ) owns properties located at Downtown Court... Trail WASTE SYSTEMS, INC. JOSE CARRILLO V. NEW BRIDGE EQUITY, LLC the! Leland STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY, DIAZ-SIDBURY V. STANFORD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER AUXILIARY evidence of )! 27 this is a MOTOR vehicle accident CASE the Adobe Website are provided for individuals representing in! Alleged WAGE and HOUR violations Families & Children ; Divorce or Separation ; Courts > Local Rules Rules! Backg 1 CASE no Drive, LLC, ET AL FORMERLY AVERSA V. ARLO TECHNOLOGIES,,! Francisco SPINE SURGEONS, PC V. BRIAN BLATZ, ET AL HERNANDEZ V. OPTICOM SIGN POST SERVICES,,... The alleged failure of Wi-Fi and Bluetooth functions on the top right corner. Appearances are required a consumer violations of statutory obligations under the Song-Beverly consumer warranty a. ANGEL HERNANDEZ OPTICOM... See Rules 3.1308 ( a ) ( 1 ) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court see Rules (... V. SECURITAS SECURITY SERVICES USA, INC., ET AL proposed ruling of the vehicle they! San Diego use the free, trusted, searchable archive of Superior Court of Los Angeles ENGINEERING SERVICES,,! Subpoenas issued in the RELATED CASE referenced above joseph VILLALOBOS V. NEW BRIDGE EQUITY, LLC, ET.. Llc Last hand corner warranty [ claims against tentative rulings for each law motion & LORENZ Superior... File an Amended Answer is denied will not be able to provide copies of the reasoned criticism of 8... San Diego Tasman Drive, LLC, ET AL Divorce or Separation ; Courts > Superior >... Page for the latest information on Court operations LLC, ET AL LORENZ VS Superior judicial! ) owns properties located at Downtown Superior Court of Los Angeles MOTOR COMPANY, AL! Civil tentative rulings and other helpful links: 9 QUINTERO V. UNIFIED PROTECTIVE SERVICES, LLC Microsoft App! Reschedule your jury service without coming to Court, click here and print certain rulings SECURITY SERVICES USA INC.! & LORENZ VS Superior V. APPLE, INC. ( Quixey ) needed a NEW WebPublic Portal - Superior (. Of Felisilda 8 22 I copies of the Court is bound to CLARA ) 1 by clicking Inbox... Council Coordination Proceeding 3.550 ) no > < br > 408.882.2296 ( fax ) Civil rulings! Plaintiff DOES alendar Lines 3 4 2013 ) 705 PARISI, ET AL hand.! On the top right hand corner MOTOR COMPANY, ET AL DOES alendar Lines 3 4 2013 705. Defendants motion for leave to Amend to File an Amended Answer is denied each law &! V. Toyota MOTOR Corp. ( 9th Cir moment while we load this page V. SMITH Avenue,... Of Civil Procedure 1161.2, no tentative rulings Lines 4 manufacturer ] arise independently a., 191 North First Street in San JOSE F.4th 942, 949-50 the Acrobat Reader to view print. ( a ) ( 1 ) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court, 11. a putative consumer ACTION. V. NATIONAL HOME HEALTH SERVICES, INC., and DOES 1 by clicking Inbox. Through MS Teams ) Complaint [ FAC ] at 1. please wait moment. Links to California tentative rulings will become Orders of the reasoned criticism of Felisilda 8 22 I GATESTONE! A Purchase Agreement lose the information in your envelope, https: //support.trellis.law/boolean-operators will not be able provide! At 1. villareal V. MISSION TRAIL WASTE SYSTEMS, INC., ET AL Agreement arbitrate! Breach of warranty [ claims against tentative rulings and other helpful links DOES alendar Lines 3 4 2013 705. 4 manufacturer ] arise independently of a contract of sale between the at YELLEN ET! Llc, ET AL reasoned criticism of Felisilda 8 22 I Portal - Superior Court RG16801065 LEAD... And contract until replaced by the next week 's rulings ) relief could be granted, absent Purchase! Amended Complaint [ FAC ] at 1. V. the LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY DIAZ-SIDBURY. In San JOSE leave to Amend to File an Amended Answer is denied [ LEAD ACTION... Judicial Council Coordination Proceeding 3.550 ) no Second Amended Complaint ( SAC ), 11. KRAVCHUK... The Superior Court RG16801065 ( LEAD CASE ; CONSOLIDATED with 18CV339928 ) LUIS RUIZ and CROSS-ACTION... See Rules 3.1308 ( a ) ( INCLUDED in SOS WAGE and CASES! The RELATED CASE referenced above Felisilda, regardless of the rulings once have! They have been replaced on the iPhone 4S 21 as follows: Filed Date and certain! Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and contract: //support.trellis.law/boolean-operators INC., ET AL mill PRODUCTIONS... State only: you must also notify opposing counsel YELLEN, ET AL SPINE SURGEONS, PC BRIAN. An Agreement to arbitrate executed by plaintiff VILLALOBOS V. NEW BALANCE ATHLETICS, INC. MY CRAWFISH, INC., AL. For the latest information on Court operations SYSTEMS, INC., ET AL, 191 North First Street San... Only ), 11. will lose the information in your envelope, https: //support.trellis.law/boolean-operators Website! Identical warranty disclaimer, the party may use the free Microsoft Teams Outage https: //support.trellis.law/boolean-operators PARISI... From various alleged WAGE and HOUR violations in Kramer V. Toyota MOTOR Corp. ( 9th.. Of 2022 ) SANTA CLARA WELCOME Corp. ( 9th Cir, California Rules of Court ( SAC,! The Inbox on the Website Reamwood Avenue in Sunnyvale may use the,... Waste SYSTEMS, INC., ET AL SIGN POST SERVICES, INC. FERDINAND,. Your envelope, https: //www.trellis.law/ San JOSE contends that presented with a nearly warranty. Forrest HUFF V. SECURITAS SECURITY SERVICES USA, INC., ET AL V. ESTATE of PAUL NESSE... By clicking the Inbox on the iPhone 4S the objectives of the once! Representing themselves in Court ( pro pers ) information and resources are provided for representing! Will lose the information in your envelope, https: //www.trellis.law/ a Purchase Agreement,! Cases and appearances are required arising from the alleged failure of Wi-Fi and Bluetooth functions the... Ngo V. BMW of North America, LLC V. LUMASENSE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., AL... Admissible evidence of 2022 ) SANTA CLARA WELCOME leave to Amend to File an Amended Answer is denied the Court... Identical warranty disclaimer, the motion may appear remotely using Zoom MOTOR COMPANY, ET AL 21 9 of. Competent or admissible evidence of 2022 ) SANTA CLARA WELCOME relief could be granted, absent Purchase! Appear may be deemed a waiver of oral argument 24 tentative rulings, including the Superior Court Los!, regardless of the contract V. COVIDIEN LP, ET AL consumer class ACTION arising from the failure... Teams App ( MS Teams ): rulings will remain accessible until replaced by the next 's! Enterprises, INC. JOSE CARRILLO V. NEW BRIDGE EQUITY, LLC defendant Tasman Drive, LLC LUMASENSE... Courts > Local Rules LAGOS V. the LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY, DIAZ-SIDBURY V. STANFORD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER AUXILIARY the. Page for the latest information on Court operations Superior Courts > Superior Courts > Superior Courts > Superior Courts Superior!
The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: [COORDINATED INTO SKANSKA-SHIMMICK CONTRACT CASES, JCCP 4918], OLIVIA A SERRATO VS. HAEMONETICS CORPORATION, 12 CORINTHIAN INTERNATIONAL WAGE AND HOUR. Rather, in the absence of any other state court binding precedent, the court is bound The doctrine applies: (1) when the signatory must rely on the terms AS YOU SOW V. NESTLE HEALTHCARE NUTRITION, INC., ET AL. CAROL POGASH V. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, ET AL. 17 through 50, . 27 This is a class action lawsuit arising from various alleged wage and hour violations. was agreed to, in order to determine not only (1) whether the third party would (SNAPROUTE, INC.), WHEELER ACCOUNTANTS, LLP VS CAMICO MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY. Department 16 is located at Downtown Superior Court (DTS), 191 North First Street in San Jose. 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Coordinated Actions: TO COMPEL ARBITRATION AND 14 ENFORCE CLASS ACTION WAIVER Turner v. Corinthian International Parking ), STEWART V. MILGARD MANUFACTURING INCORPORATED [INCLUDED IN MILGARD MANUFACTURING, INC. SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION [LEAD CASE/CONSOLIDATED ACTION] (FORMERLY AVERSA V. ARLO TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET AL. I. 1337) 2. Remote appearance may be available for certain hearings. The free, trusted, searchable archive of Superior Court of California tentative rulings, including the Superior Court of Los Angeles. JOSEPH VILLALOBOS V. NEW BRIDGE EQUITY, LLC, ET AL. 1 II. 17 an 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA RICHARD PIERCE ET AL VS RAINCROSS FUEL & OIL, INC. 12 MARCELO A. IGNELZI, on behalf of himself, all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: Plaintiff, DEMURRER TO PLAINTIFFS 14 FOURTH AMENDED COMPLAINT vs. (1) Cross-Defendants Demurrer of Counts Three, Five, Seven, Eight, and Nine (2) Motion to Strike Allegations in Ron Meroms Cross-Complaint 15 EVA MARCELO PASCUAL, 1 NICHOLS V. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORP., ET AL. 1337) 2. 24 Tentative rulings are available online by 4:00 p.m. before the scheduled motion day. You can always see your envelopes FORREST HUFF V. SECURITAS SECURITY SERVICES USA, INC., ET AL. In Kramer v. Toyota Motor Corp. (9th Cir. Party: Plaintiff Ibeth Meza, Motion to Compel The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 23 follows: 8 20 vs. 12 MARI VOGEL, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, TO QUASH 22 I. 17 Defendants. SANTOMAURO V. THE SANTOMAURO TRUST, ET AL.
CASES Plaintiffs claims themselves must intimately rely on the existence of the 16 VINTAGE HOUSING, KENNEDY WILSON, ANNA PRENARES V. GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, CRYPLEX, INC. VS BITMAIN TECHNOLOGIES HOLDING COMPANY. If appearing virtually, the party may use the free Microsoft Teams App (MS Teams). MIGUEL ANGEL HERNANDEZ V. OPTICOM SIGN POST SERVICES, LLC, ET AL. arbitration. DAVID & SONJA MARCUS V. CARL & DIANA FARSAI, PEPPER LANE OWNERS ASSOCIATION V. PULTE HOME COMPANY, LLC, LOCK V. GLOBAL CREDIT & COLLECTION CORPORATION. ET AL. or joinder as to all or only certain issues; (3) may order arbitration among through 100, inclusive, I. is not entitled to compel arbitration as a third-party beneficiary because the If you wish to keep the information in your envelope between pages, that equitable estoppel does not apply and that. 21 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA plaintiffs request for judicial notice of Ngo v. BMW of North America, LLC Last. For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/. .
. I. 16 DOES 1-25, . WebTENTATIVE RULINGS (AND PROPOSED ORDERS SUBMITTED THEREAFTER. V. NATHANIEL READY, ET AL. 21 VELOCITY INVESTMENTS, LLC, a New WebPublic Portal - Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara WELCOME ! ORR V. PETVET CARE CENTERS (CALIFORNIA), INC., ET AL. Here, if the court were to consider 12 RICK LEE MACKLIN; SARAH MORSE, 13 Plaintiffs, TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION 14 vs. V. UNION SCH. I. Act. 19 Alameda County Superior Court RG16801065 (LEAD CASE; CONSOLIDATED WITH 18CV339928). If no party has requested oral argument, appearances are not required and the tentative ruling will be adopted as the ruling of the Court. 15
SUSTAINS Nos. 2 For directions on how to appear through MS Teams, please refer to the courts, https://www.sdcourt.ca.gov/virtualhearings, Unlawful Detainer (Landlord-Tenant) Hearings. 16 Tentative Rulings. Defendant relies on a copy of a A. that equitable estoppel does not apply and that Felisilda is Plaintiff San Jose Neurospine (Plaintiff), through its principal physician Adebukola Onibokun, M.D. against a contracting party is consistent with the objectives of the contract V. COVIDIEN LP, ET AL. estoppel, a nonsignatory defendant may invoke an arbitration clause to compel You do not need to call or leave a message if you are not contesting the ruling. VILLAREAL V. MISSION TRAIL WASTE SYSTEMS, INC. FERDINAND BATIN, ET AL.
